Supreme Court Sound Bites

Supreme Court Sound Bites: Audio Opinions

Welcome

Welcome to Supreme Court Sound Bites!

Supreme Court Sound Bites is an audio archive of Supreme Court opinions. The archive focuses initially on opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States that define the rights of Americans. We will gradually include audio recordings of all Supreme Court opinions, including audio recordings of the opinions of the highest court in each state. “Sound Bites” refers to the bite-sized, easily digestible audio clips of court opinions, made by combining the power of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with human wisdom.

Why create Supreme Court Sound Bites? We believe that Americans are more likely to listen to audio recordings of Supreme Court opinions than to read them. From free speech and religious rights, to voting and equal treatment rights, and many others, people will better understand what it means to have rights by listening to audio recordings on Supreme Court Sound Bites. Only when we fully understand our rights as defined by the Supreme Court can we fully enjoy the blessings of living in America, or understand the changes we need to make in our laws to create an even better America.

What does it mean to have rights? In the United States of America, the Supreme Court of the United States is the ultimate authority on rights. Are rights recognized by a divided court just as valid as rights recognized by a unanimous court? The Supreme Court has the power to define new rights, change the balance of competing rights, and it can even take away rights enjoyed by millions of people for many years. If rights are real, why do they change based on the members of the Supreme Court? By making Supreme Court opinions more accessible, Supreme Court Sound Bites aims to help us all to better understand what it means to have rights.

How can you help? Since its creation, the Supreme Court of the United States has written over 20,000 decisions. Despite the tremendous power of the Supreme Court over the lives of every American, most people will probably never read a Supreme Court opinion. We welcome your help to decide which topics and cases to prioritize for audio recordings. Click below to see what we have done so far.

Criminal Rights

Balzac v. Porto Rico (1922): Does a criminal defendant in a United States territory like Puerto Rico have a right to a jury trial?

Betts v. Brady (1942): Does a poor criminal defendant have a right to a defense attorney paid for by the government?

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): Does a poor criminal defendant have a right to a defense attorney paid for by the government?

Miranda v. Arizona (1966): Does a criminal defendant have a right to be told about the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney before being interrogated in custody?

Faretta v. California (1975): Does a criminal defendant have a right to refuse defense counsel paid for by the government, and to represent him or herself?

Taylor v. Louisiana (1975): Does a male criminal defendant have a right to have women included on the jury deciding the case?

Woodson v. North Carolina (1976): Does a criminal convicted of first degree murder have a right to not be mandatorily sentenced to death?

Coker v. Georgia (1977): Does a criminal convicted of rape have a right to not be sentenced to death?

Beck v. Alabama (1980): Does a criminal convicted of murder have a right to avoid a sentence of death, if the jury was not permitted to consider a penalty less than death?

Ford v. Wainwright (1986): Does a criminal convicted of murder and sentenced to death have a right to avoid execution if he becomes insane after sentencing?

Nix v. Whiteside (1986): Does a criminal defendant have a right for their attorney help them lie at trial?

Coy v. Iowa (1988): Does a criminal defendant have a right to see a witness who is present in court?

Atkins v. Virginia (2002): Does a mentally retarded criminal convicted of murder have a right to not be sentenced to death?

Roper v. Simmons (2005): Does a minor convicted of murder have a right to not be sentenced to death?

Oregon v. Guzek (2006): Does a criminal convicted of murder have a right to introduce new evidence not presented at trial?

United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez (2006): Is a criminal defendant only entitled to a competent counsel, or to the specific counsel desired?

Graham v. Florida (2010): Does a minor convicted of a crime less than murder have a right to be sentenced with the possibility of parole?

Miller v. Alabama (2012): Does a minor convicted of murder have a right to not be mandatorily sentenced to death?

Madison v. Alabama (2019): Does a criminal with dementia who is convicted of murder have a right to not be sentenced to death?

Ramos v. Louisiana (2020): Does a criminal defendant have a right to be convicted only by a unanimous jury?

Jones v. Mississippi (2021): Does a minor convicted of murder have a right to be found permanently incorrigible before being sentenced to life without parole?

City of Grants Pass v. Johnson (2024): Does a homeless person have a right to camp on public property without being prosecuted?

Trump v. United States (2024): Does a former President of the United States have absolute immunity from criminal prosecutions for actions performed while President?

Free Speech Rights

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969): Does a student have a right to protest government policy at school?

Morse v. Frederick (2007): Does a student have a right to promote illegal drug use while at school?

Citizens United v. FEC (2010): Do corporations have a right to express political opinions?

Snyder v. Phelps (2011): Is there a right to protest at a funeral with signs displaying messages that are offensive and upsetting?

United States v. Alvarez (2012): Is there a right to falsely claim that you have won a military medal?

Reed v. Town of Gilbert (2015): Does a church have a right to post a temporary sign directing people to its location without getting permission from the government?

Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (2018): Does a worker have a right to refuse to pay fees to a union that represents all workers, but that the worker did not join, because the worker opposed many of the union’s positions?

Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018): Does a religious baker who opposes same-sex marriage have a right to refuse to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding?

Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky (2018): Does a voter have a right to wear a political badge, a political button or anything bearing a political message in a polling place on Election Day?

Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. (2021): Does a student have a right to use profanity to criticize a school when the student is away from school?

303 Creative LLC v. Elenis (2023): Does a religious website designer who opposes same-sex marriage have a right to refuse to create a website that celebrates the marriage of a same-sex couple?

Immigration Rights

Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886): Does a non-citizen who resides in the United States have a right to be treated the same as a citizen with regards to constitutional rights?

Fong Yue Ting v. U.S. (1893): Does a non-citizen who resides in the United States have a right to remain in the United States despite an order of deportation?

Wong Wing v. U.S. (1896): Does a non-citizen who resides in the United States have a right to not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law?

United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898): Do children born in the United States have a right to be citizens even though their parents are non-citizens?

Perez v. Brownell (1958): Does a citizen of the United States have a right to vote in a foreign political election and retain United States citizenship?

Afroyim v. Rusk (1967): Does a citizen of the United States have a right to vote in a foreign political election and retain United States citizenship?

Graham v. Richardson (1971): Does a non-citizen who resides in the United States have a right to welfare benefits given to citizens?

Fedorenko v. U.S. (1981): Does a naturalized citizen have a right to remain a citizen even though he did not strictly comply with all the requirements to acquire citizenship?

Plyler v. Doe (1982): Does a child who entered the United States illegally have a right to attend public schools?

Demore v. Kim (2003): Does a non-citizen who is being processed for deportation have a right to be free from detention during deportation proceedings?

Jennings v. Rodriguez (2018): Does a non-citizen who is being processed for deportation have a right to periodic bond hearings during the course of their detention?

State Supreme Court Cases

Alambama

Alaska

Arizona

Arkansas

California

Colorado

Connecticut

Delware

Florida

Georgia

Hawaii

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maine

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Mississippi

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

New York

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

South Carolina

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Vermont

Virginia

Washington

West Virginia